Exetools

Exetools (https://forum.exetools.com/index.php)
-   Community Tools (https://forum.exetools.com/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   mupack (https://forum.exetools.com/showthread.php?t=17028)

mudlord 04-08-2016 20:08

1 Attachment(s)
Updated:

* Added commandline support.

mudlord 04-09-2016 17:25

1 Attachment(s)
Updated:

* Hack around commandline issues.
* Fixed bug on displaying depacker stub size.

Max 04-14-2016 10:16

The last 2 version does not work in windows xp.

It prompt exe is not a valid win32 application.

Storm Shadow 04-14-2016 13:34

im not on xp , but try.

Code:

D:\mupack>editbin /SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS,5.1 mupack_pub.exe
ref
https://supportxpdotcom.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/editbins-dirty-little-secret/

mudlord 04-21-2016 10:46

1 Attachment(s)
Updated:

* Fixed compiler flags to work on XP again, sorry about that.

cybercoder 04-30-2016 09:58

Also you could change MajorLinkerVersion to 0E, MajorOperatingSystemVersion to 5, MinorOperatingSystemVersion to 01, MajorSubsystemversion to 5 and MinorSubsystemversion to 1 inside optional header to make it run on xp.. Although this solution is not really needed.. it's another way :)

mudlord 05-13-2016 05:44

To me its preferred if its done upstream, like its supposed to be. It was meant to be fixed, as it was a bug after all.

Abaddon 05-21-2016 20:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by cybercoder (Post 105072)
Also you could change MajorLinkerVersion to 0E, MajorOperatingSystemVersion to 5, MinorOperatingSystemVersion to 01, MajorSubsystemversion to 5 and MinorSubsystemversion to 1 inside optional header to make it run on xp.. Although this solution is not really needed.. it's another way :)

Setting:

[a] peHeader.MajorOperatingSystemVersion = 5;
[b] peHeader.MinorOperatingSystemVersion = 1;
[c] peHeader.MajorSubsystemVersion = 5;
[d] peHeader.MinorSubsystemVersion = 1;

would make a binary run under XP, although setting only [a] and [c] should suffice...
Having the source, however, mudlord's is the way to follow.

mudlord 07-05-2016 07:42

For those that care, released the source code to the current public and private versions of the packer.

Code:

https://github.com/mudlord/mupack
Code:

http://mudlord.info/crap/mupack.rar
Password: www.mudlord.info


jvoisin 12-11-2016 05:09

What made you change your mind about releasing the source code? I thought that you said that it won't happen.

cybercoder 12-11-2016 06:31

Somebody used it for bad things and it is now detected as virus by anti virus.. if you read the readme in the source you would not have to ask this question..

mudlord 12-11-2016 12:07

And since someone leaked it from Exetools, now bad people use it. So whats the point of fighting it? Might as well let the bad people have 100% control now. >_>

At least I still have mupack3 for myself, which has a completely different stub and different structure. It still uses the LZMA and rangecoder+lz77 decompressors since to me those are still decent. And it has better code preprocessing, and fixes the problems mupack2 had. And no, that won't be public to anyone.

So thank the bad people for ruining things. Seems people cannot be trusted.

mudlord 05-27-2017 19:11

Did a update a while back to get it to run on XP.

I wonder whats the point since XP is now deprecated, but nonetheless...
Quote:

http://mudlord.info/crap/mupack.rar
pw: www.mudlord.info

ReBirth 09-15-2017 19:41

@mudlord
what about making "mupack" open source ?


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 19:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX