View Single Post
  #1  
Old 10-22-2016, 11:19
t3xc0d3 t3xc0d3 is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 9
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 4 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 24 Times in 9 Posts
t3xc0d3 Reputation: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cryo View Post
I can't find anything on easily reversing modular exponentiation other than brute force, but would brute force really be the only option to approaching this with such large inputs?
Generally speaking, yes. If a general algorithm that is simpler than brute force would exist, then the cryptosystems would not longer be secure. To be exact, it is it known if simpler methods exist. It *might* be the case, but they have not been found.

One thing you might try is to analyse if they have been included their secret key somewhere. You will not find anything, if they have done their homework. However, I have found private RSA keys in binaries several times...

In addition, if you are able to determine which algorithm they use and which configuration (e.g., which prime values, ...) they use, you might be able to find an attack vector. If they used a insecure configuration (e.g., too short primes), you win. The analysis can (will) be really cumbersome.

Last edited by t3xc0d3; 10-22-2016 at 11:28.
Reply With Quote