![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The toggling between 591 M/s and 1.4 G/s is actually expected behavior when using --gpu-limit — it's a duty-cycle mechanism (compute burst → sleep → compute burst). The reported speed alternates between instantaneous (high) and averaged (low). Nothing wrong there, that's by design. However, while investigating this I stumbled onto something bigger: your agent was over-reporting iteration counts by roughly 50× compared to the actual Distinguished Points it produced. All 27 other agents had a perfectly normal DP/iteration ratio (around 100%), while yours was sitting at ~2%. This caused the dashboard to show inflated progress (135% instead of the real ~91%). We've now corrected the totals and the ETA is accurate again. Possible cause: are you by any chance running multiple instances of the solver with the same --worker-name? That would explain it — each instance reports its own iteration count to the server, but the DP production doesn't scale proportionally if they're all fighting for the same GPU. Quick check: Make sure you have only one solver_fast.exe running per GPU If you want to use multiple GPUs, use --device N to assign each instance to a different GPU, with different worker names I've also added a server-side guard (v1.4.2) that validates the DP/iteration ratio per agent, so this kind of inflation can't happen again regardless of the cause. Thanks for being part of the battle! Your GPU is doing great work. |
| Tags |
| bolero, ecdlp |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Replacing ECDSA in Target (arma) | Mynotos | General Discussion | 3 | 11-22-2019 00:49 |