![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Unbeatable" protection
Hi,
Software protection is inherently flawed. With creative use of a dongle (i.e. irretrievable *hardware* public-key encryption of critical sections of code), it is possible to create a protection second-to-none - but even that is vulnerable to several 'man-in-the-middle' and reverse-engineering attacks. It may be computationally infeasible to break a particular protection, but impossibility is not guaranteed unless a problem is not merely NP-hard but NP-complete, and in the latter case, brute force is still possible. Software protection attempts to *minimize* the impact of users defrauding the business; at this, it is most successful in many instances. By the way: challenging someone to "crack this" seems more like a cheap attempt to have someone else work for you. -archaios |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| rank your "uncrackable" software protection | LaBBa | General Discussion | 114 | 04-29-2024 15:52 |
| NEW Armadillo Version said UNCRACKABLE LOL | azaza | General Discussion | 4 | 01-04-2004 17:27 |
| CodeLock -- Still Uncrackable?? | Spleen | General Discussion | 17 | 10-02-2003 22:22 |