![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
THere is a tradeoff (as usually
)1) either you use pure Sw protection - will be broken/reversed/patched/etc sooner or later 2) you use HW based protection (so called dongle protection) - will be broken/emulated/etc later or more later ![]() both way has pros and cons (as usually) you see the point... if you really want to make the time to reverse/break your app long and expensive - look into vm based protectors. I've heard that nowadays some .net protectors use their custom built VM machines to execute the code under VM layer - probably that would be most advanced type of protection. the rest of protectors are just a matter of time/skills to break (just look what de4dot could do....) 2) dongle based protection - will be strong only if you architect to use it as a black box that does smth valuable inside - eg you feed some input data, it executes (!!!) some code inside and produces the answer. I"m not talking about query-response, but a real live user code that does some math/algo, etc the rest will be dumped/emulated/patched, mate..... that is my IMHO vision, so probably I'd be wrong in some parts s. P.S. there is a 3rd way - the best way to protect is 0 protection . I.E concetrate on the user functionality/features/values instead of putting money/efforts/time into process that will be broken sooner or later.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windows XP Key Generation Source Code | blue_devil | Source Code | 1 | 05-29-2023 03:54 |
| The Windows XP source code was allegedly leaked online | DARKER | General Discussion | 21 | 11-20-2020 02:30 |
| C# (Classic .exe, Windows 10, Windows Phone etc.) Protection | delidolunet | General Discussion | 7 | 10-11-2016 01:10 |