Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 10-15-2015, 14:18
mudlord's Avatar
mudlord mudlord is offline
Family
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 83
Rept. Given: 11
Rept. Rcvd 69 Times in 25 Posts
Thanks Given: 37
Thanks Rcvd at 190 Times in 50 Posts
mudlord Reputation: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by giv View Post
Because are pirated (stolen/leaked legitimate copy) or the AV you use is not good as it should.
The problem with kkrunchy is the second part. Its just a fundamental problem all AVs have. They see kkrunchy as a black box as well as most other packers, and so they flag it as suspicious (UPX gets through since its so easy to generically unpack). The taggant system was meant to help mitigate the problem, but in practise it does almost nothing (unless you are a protector vendor, and want to stop people ripping off your DRM). Code signing stuff with digital signatures also is pretty useless.

I just think the AV system is fundamentally f***ed.

A alternative to kkrunchy though is beroexepacker, but it might suffer the same problems. It has a lot more support for things in EXEs and DLLs and when tuned right, can give the same compression ratios as kkrunchy because it can use the same compression algorithm.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mudlord For This Useful Post:
giv (10-15-2015)
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Executable Debugger lucky7456969 General Discussion 0 02-24-2004 13:14
Dos executable cAtA General Discussion 3 05-20-2003 08:49


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 17:04.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )