Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2004, 19:08
VD76
 
Posts: n/a
Yes ok , you are right.
I never have purchased anything but speaking about protectors
sorry i think the best protector is XProtector even with some bugs.
And why this?
Because I DON"T HAVE SEEN ANY UNPACKED VERSION OF IT!

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2004, 23:05
iwill
 
Posts: n/a
XProtector crashed my pc when I run it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2004, 23:20
MaRKuS-DJM's Avatar
MaRKuS-DJM MaRKuS-DJM is offline
Cracker + Unpacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Virtual World / Network
Posts: 553
Rept. Given: 7
Rept. Rcvd 6 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks Given: 3
Thanks Rcvd at 16 Times in 10 Posts
MaRKuS-DJM Reputation: 6
xprotector was never unpacked because it does not run *joking*
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2004, 01:55
Jay Jay is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 249
Rept. Given: 31
Rept. Rcvd 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks Given: 15
Thanks Rcvd at 13 Times in 5 Posts
Jay Reputation: 3
because..

xprotector never got unpacked cos evaluator never got around to it only way to stop him is put a contract out on him, gotta hate that guy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2004, 13:09
evaluator
 
Posts: n/a
guys..

i'm just poor musician, so can't crash too much my PC because of arrogant protector..

BUT!!
if you collect for my some $$ for new PC for me, I will crash&crash it for unpacking xprotector
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2004, 16:32
kratorius
 
Posts: n/a
Xprotector is quite unstable, really good for crackmes I think, but not for commercial appz.
It adds a heavy overload at your program (and make your program's size incredibly grow), and sometimes neven can be run well. Btw, if you don't add a heavy protection (I mean, not using 2000 de/crypting layers and the other things it can provide), sometimes could be useful.
For the discussion about ASprotect vs Armadillo, I can say only that I read some tutes about asprotect's manual unpacking and I found its methods very interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-02-2004, 18:38
VD76
 
Posts: n/a
yes , ok , xprotector is unstable because it is a very new product.
And this (i think) because it includes some very new characteristics such as the Ring0 binding , that is an "unknown word" for some other protection tools.

Take a look at the whitepaper...it is a very professional project.

Ok , every good project needs time...beta-testing , feedbacks and i believe
that everyone (interested in protection technology) must help good programmers.(this is my personal think)

I am using also , asprotect , armadillo and ok these versions are very very very stable.
They have 99% compatibility.
But these protection tools are available since the last 3-4 years.
And as we can say , the "beta-testing" is already completed.

XProtector as i can remember is only available in the last 1 + year.

But let's see the guys from xprotector team what they will make in the next 1 - 2 years.
After that period , we can again give our positive or negative vote

But again , i don't have seen an unpacked or cracked version and i don't believe that the biggest's minds arround the globe don't have tried to crack it.
Am i right ?

Regards,
VD
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Protection: ASProtect 2 or Armadillo 4? smartins General Discussion 22 01-24-2005 04:27
ASProtect 1.23 RC4 - 1.3.08.24 LaBBa General Discussion 1 05-13-2004 23:54


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 22:36.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )