![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
ManSun, you can find more information on Armadillo's forum: http://support.siliconrealms.com/
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
But
but, there are only general uselesness informations...;-/
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
ManSun,
I don't think it's a matter of weak cryptographic algorithm. Software protection against cracking has not much to do with cryptographic algorithms....my sister, without cryptographic knowledge, could wait till the program is decrypted in memory and user LordPE do dump the decrypted program in memory ![]() About the rest of your question...maybe you should give more details about what you want to know exaclty, and not asking that general question that could be answer in Armadillo's help
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
What cryptography algorithms does use Armadillo and what keys a dyn!o and other talking about??? (Skamer made keygenerators for Armadillo, but he didin't dump decrypted parts from memory....my brother ;>)
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi there!
"I don't think it's a matter of weak cryptographic algorithm." Well, keygenerating relies in the most part in the cryptography but the software protection itself doesn't have to deal with cryptography only and it's rather about anti-***, anti-*** etc. stuff. What I want to say? I mean that Armadillo keygeneration was caused only by a silly bug which was now solved (I am still very surprsied why so late). What algo Arma uses? ECC. What that gives us? Nothing beacause this time the settings and binary material were carefully chosen so don't waste your time brothers. Does that make Armadillo uncrackable? No, it makes it unkeygenable ![]() Good luck, dyn!o |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
to peleon
with all my respects, in armadillo with copymem2, if you wait till program is full decrypted in memory you wait eternally, never is full decypted in memory, the father process copy only 1000 bytes in the child process, execute this 1000 bytes and erase this 1000 bytes, copy other 1000 bytes execute and erase, never the target is full decrypted, the solucion is force the farher decrypt all and next beggining to execute, but is not a work for my sister, jeje is a hard work, and next you can fight with the nanomites, when you have the full program dumped, not run by nanomites (INT3), the jmps of the original program was replaced by INT3, and you can determine, what jump are (conditional or jmp) if jump or not jump ,and where jump, if you put your sister to make this work, you are a bad brother, jeje.
Ricardo |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
lol, point taken. I wont make my sis do it
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| two questions for admin | TomaHawk | General Discussion | 8 | 04-01-2014 00:51 |
| 2 questions about hasp | suddenLy | General Discussion | 3 | 01-12-2005 01:51 |
| 2 questions (IDA / Windows 2k/2k3) | skyper | General Discussion | 8 | 04-22-2004 08:44 |
| questions about code | bartster | General Discussion | 19 | 02-14-2004 01:31 |
| some unpacking questions | gnasher | General Discussion | 2 | 01-03-2004 20:44 |