Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2004, 03:59
JMI JMI is offline
Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,627
Rept. Given: 5
Rept. Rcvd 199 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 98 Times in 96 Posts
JMI Reputation: 100-199 JMI Reputation: 100-199
And some of us actually have a legitimate key that doesn't need changing. Sometimes one can even talk M$ into giving a "real" key.

And gabri3l, the thread on ieXbeta may have been "started" on May 23, 2004, but the list they show there (as seen above) was posted by qapman on July 15, 2004 with a clickable link to the Worz.net page that was posted on July 14th. Credit should go where credit is due and if c4p0ne got it from there, or some other place, credit for the source should be mentioned. One would assume even Worz.net got it somewhere.


Regards,
__________________
JMI
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-16-2004, 07:37
gabri3l's Avatar
gabri3l gabri3l is offline
Parity Error 0x0FF2131D
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Eastern Shore
Posts: 118
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 5 Times in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 8
Thanks Rcvd at 21 Times in 10 Posts
gabri3l Reputation: 5
I was looking at this thread. hxxp://board.iexbeta.com/ibf10/index.php?showtopic=43587 But you raise an interesting point. I wonder where the list came from in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-16-2004, 11:39
JMI JMI is offline
Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,627
Rept. Given: 5
Rept. Rcvd 199 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 98 Times in 96 Posts
JMI Reputation: 100-199 JMI Reputation: 100-199
gabri3l: You are indeed correct about your earlier statement that ieXbeta seems to have had "the list" first. I just did a quick search and found this thread:

http://board.iexbeta.com/ibf10/index.php?showtopic=42017

but your thread there IS clearly earlier than this one and earlier that Worz.net's list. Bonus points for you.

But we both remain with the question: "Who discovered the list?" My supicion is that it is actually in the code for the SP2 update and some clever cracker managed to extract it from there. But until somebody tell, we won't know.

Regards,
__________________
JMI
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2004, 15:26
c4p0ne's Avatar
c4p0ne c4p0ne is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: n/a
Posts: 83
Rept. Given: 1
Rept. Rcvd 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Rcvd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
c4p0ne Reputation: 1
Post

Well actually, (and obviously) I don't deserve credit for the above posted list. Actually, I never ask for (and usually TRY not to imply) credit for anything that I post in any of the dosen or so forums I am registered with. However, just for the record someone on IRC (irc.efnet.net) gave me the list by the name of n1n0r so I guess I should have mentioned that. Since probably no one knows who that guy is I figured "wtf" i'll just post it for the convenience of anyone who may have not known or who required it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-16-2004, 16:20
JMI JMI is offline
Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,627
Rept. Given: 5
Rept. Rcvd 199 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 98 Times in 96 Posts
JMI Reputation: 100-199 JMI Reputation: 100-199
No actual criticism was intended by my comments. I was just generally teasing about the similiar post on Worz.net in close proximity to your's here and then gabri3l reported a sighting before Worz posted it.

We then just speculated on who may have actually made the discovery, and you had not said, one way or the other, so we didn't know whether you made the discovery or found it some place, but hadn't said. No biggie.

Regards,
__________________
JMI
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-17-2004, 07:58
gabri3l's Avatar
gabri3l gabri3l is offline
Parity Error 0x0FF2131D
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Eastern Shore
Posts: 118
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 5 Times in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 8
Thanks Rcvd at 21 Times in 10 Posts
gabri3l Reputation: 5
Yes, please do not think I was being a smartass. You just sparked our curiosity over the origination of the list.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2004, 02:57
c4p0ne's Avatar
c4p0ne c4p0ne is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: n/a
Posts: 83
Rept. Given: 1
Rept. Rcvd 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Rcvd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
c4p0ne Reputation: 1
Thumbs down Hmm..

Hey what if one has a key like: XXXXX-OEM-0044283-XXXXX ? Is it possible to generate with what we have?

I mean for instance, one has a 100% legit Copy of Windows XP Pro on the original CD even for good measure . The user installs this copy once, twice, OOOPS! Third time's a charm meaning Windows demands activation because as we've discussed, either things have changed "inside" the PC, or the copy has been installed "too many times during a predefined period of M$ time". Now what. Does there exist the possiblity to actually activate the damn thing with a key created by the 4in1 keygen (a key that falls completely out of the banned range)?

I highly doubt that myself (unfortunately) so then the question would be, if Windows is already asking for activation, is it possible (without physical patching of exe's) to make it believe it's been activated. As I said I've tried dosens of keys (VLK and other) generated by the 4in1 that simply wont "stick" when that update button is pressed on the windows activation dialog... All you get is "retry, retry, retry, etc.."

Perhaps I'm not generating VLK's that fall out of the banned range the right way (doubt that too) but oh well, worse comes to worst by the time this joint expires I'll have final version of Fedora to put back on this little laptop. The only reason I took Fedora off actually is cause I absolutely could not get dial-up working but fuck that who needs dial up I just take this little jammy to work and pop it on the big line.



Last edited by c4p0ne; 07-20-2004 at 03:10.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Microsoft site determines if WinXP is legit. �XC�PTiON™ General Discussion 6 09-30-2004 06:19


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 22:22.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )