![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hi Ricardo, Probably someone has already told it..you are great. I have a question on arma too: i'm thinking to avoid the problem of detaching as follows: using code ignition we could create another process from the parent. every time we need to copy the 1k bytes on the son we also copy it in our new process. the advantage should be that the new process doesn't need to be detached. What do you think about it? What problems are there i can't see? Am I dreaming? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
well
I don't try this idea, but sounds logic, of the most crazy ideas, go the most great solutions, when i try the first copymem2, and i have the two process and I don't know the possibilities of the api for detach, i think innumerables crazy posibilities for defeat this protection.
One posibility is very close to yours. Injection of the api WriteProcessMemory in memory, for when write to the son a 1k block, write to the same direction of the father this block, the first section of the father was empty and was unused. maybe with this you can get the dumped in the first section of the father. I don't try make this is only the crazy ideas with possibilities I analize when i don't sleep with the arma with copymem2 trouble. Ricardo Narvaja |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| question about armadillo keytool | SubzEro | General Discussion | 1 | 02-01-2015 08:29 |
| 2 small question about armadillo... | Hero | General Discussion | 1 | 03-28-2007 19:39 |
| Question about Armadillo 3.76 | OrionOnion | General Discussion | 0 | 01-03-2005 09:17 |
| Armadillo Question | obelisk | General Discussion | 2 | 12-31-2004 12:14 |
| Another Armadillo question | *RemedY* | General Discussion | 4 | 09-05-2004 22:46 |