![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I believe he was trying to gently suggest that you might have waited awhile for some of the other "less skilled" members to take a crack at the project before you claimed the "glory" of being first. Or you might have announced that you had solved the challenge, but not "posted" the result, to allow others to continue to work on it without having to "resist" peeking at your solution.
Regards,
__________________
JMI |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good to know there is an overseer reading my minds
.Regards. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I "knew" you were going to say that.
Regards,
__________________
JMI |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
hmm. i think many of less skilled member can't download that file.
because it is hard to make 3 effective posts without being deleted. i didn't say it's impossible. but download privilege is hard to get for newbie. Last edited by arkanoid; 01-02-2005 at 05:45. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
JMI: hmm....
Arkanoid: I know it's not the right place to talk about ExeTools rules here, but let me try it quickly... there were (are) many "unwanted" users of ExeTools using FTP only and downloading interesting attachements. The problem is they are doing actually nothing for other members. Just leeching - they are even worse than Emule freaks because Emule guys share their files (at least most of them) and "bad" ExeTools "members" just leech. Not to mention commercial developers who used (use) this place to be up-to-date with cracking stage of their protections and information (tutorials) concerning their work. So, in the past it was just enough to open ExeTools account and download everything you like. Now it's a little more exacting, but it can only help other honest (working / participating) users. If you are still confused then imagine it's some unique team (like US Special Forces, Startrek or X-Files - haha) and you have to prove your membership - it will taste much better then .
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
deleted attachment + solution. hope there weren't too much who read this. but JMI... i'm only less skilled.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
dyn!o // You're definitely right.
I didn't intend to offend you. I'm sorry if you felt like that. What I tried to mean is it would be better if there's an external link or something like that, so that other guys could download and take a look. (assuming that file is for less skilled people) |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know all protection can be feated all ,but time in defeating is not same some too much some too fast cracked it.
New version i got idea from armadilo about encrypt some code before execute then decrypt it again and also protect some importance byte code but it's very simple encryption in my debug me.And another is memory patch checking it will replace with org byte when it modified . 0.2 i pack with PE compact ,i think it will not hard to unpack let enjoy FOr noobie cracker only
Last edited by Teerayoot; 01-02-2005 at 23:43. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks Teerayoot, I propose this solution but I am not sure it's you are waiting for
Last edited by Michel; 01-03-2005 at 04:19. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| x64 and anti-debugging | lena151 | x64 OS | 19 | 11-15-2011 05:24 |
| Win32 Debug Protection Idea | nelix | General Discussion | 12 | 06-07-2004 19:24 |