COMMENTS ON NEW RULES

Originally Posted by TmC

...behind the amministration of this board may have reasons that are not clear to me. Any Words?

My guess for the reason:

If you are a member you see the FTP passwd. If one gets your passwd (s)he gets the FTP passwd in the same step.
As it is not too easy to get membership the member passwd's have to be more secure to protect the FTP pass.
Particularly when there is a commonly used remember functionality, there should be something that can limit the (most times unintentional) leakage of member passwd's.

[JMI]

I agree that the password change is a "pain" but it is also a very prudent security requirement, particularily if you are aware of the number of Reversing Boards which have been hacked over the last few months. While User passwords were not the direct cause of such "successes", the concept of overall attention to proper security is a "good" thing.

How hard can it be to actually "write down" your passwords in some semi-secure location where you live? As stated, your computer will "remember" your current password for you, but that means "anyone" who has access to your computer, has access to your account and, if you are a "Member" to the FTP download password. We have already had several insistances where someone who "knew" or "discovered" the FTP password posted it on some other Board for the whole world to grab. I am reasonably sure that those of you who do not have a private password would not like a return of the days when there were, in deed, "too many users" to gain access on a regular basis.

As to where the "NEW RULES" might best be displayed, I did give that careful thought. It can not "appear" on the "Main Page" unless it is a separate Forum or part of the title. While it could be made a separate Forum, I do not have access to do so and wanted to put the information up where it would be viewed. Most of the Board's activity takes place in the "General Discussion" Forum, so I put it there. ANYONE who has not read these new RULES would arrive at the General Discussion Forum with this Thread marked with an "important" marker and it showing as a "new" Thread. One can "lead" readers to the Thread, but we can't "make" them read it, without making it like a "license" for software, where one has to click "I agree" to "continue." And how many times have you actually read what you were agreeing to, before you just clicked "I agree"? It is a fact that the vast majority of the "members" do not post at all and only read the Forums.

I do agree that everyone, including guest should be permitted to "SEARCH" the Forums and I recommend to Aaron that he permit them to do so. This would permit the widest sharing of information, to whose who may lack the skill or the courage to post, but want to start the learning process.

Regards,

[Eleven]

Originally Posted by JMI

I do agree that everyone, including guest should be permitted to "SEARCH" the Forums and I recommend to Aaron that he permit them to do so. This would permit the widest sharing of information, to whose who may lack the skill or the courage to post, but want to start the learning process.

The Search feature in vBulletin is probably the most resource-intensive feature available to normal users. I can see why it's probably not a great idea to give the people who are most likely to search straight away access to it, it could slow the server down pretty easily.

[bgrimm]

Originally Posted by Eleven

The Search feature in vBulletin is probably the most resource-intensive feature available to normal users. I can see why it's probably not a great idea to give the people who are most likely to search straight away access to it, it could slow the server down pretty easily.

I personally feel the search -must- be available to users, you really can't respond to an ill-asked question with:

"Have you Searched for the answer to your question?"

If you restrict the very way someone who wants to learn, could effectively use this resource.

The anology would be akin to openning up a library, allowing people to come in, but not allow them to look around for books.

To me the most resource-intensive feature of this board is the evident continuing need to have to point the blind towards correctly searching for their answers. (Thank you for taking the time).

If you take away there ability to search? How can one expect them to see?

As far as loading the server by search requests...

We come from all countries,
all ends of this earth,
along an electronic medium,
travelling at the speed of light thru fiber,
joining us as one great nation,
time and distance showing limitless bounds
along its endless travel...

And I'm sitting at a breakpoint in the debugger looking at a stack trace ...
...so I got time to wait...

My 2 cents,
-bg

<S Novym Godom/Happy New Year/Xin nian yu kuai/Sun nien fai lok/Bonne ann��e/La Multi Ani/Akemashite Omedetou Gozaimasu/Buon Capo d'Anno>