Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23-2005, 02:04
aldente aldente is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 266
Rept. Given: 27
Rept. Rcvd 7 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks Given: 36
Thanks Rcvd at 10 Times in 9 Posts
aldente Reputation: 7
Quote:
Office Suite => Open Office, Smart Suite
And you call that an alternative???
You probably call Fiat a "Porsche-alternative", right?

Quote:
Media player => Real Audio
But please tell me, WHAT is the advantage of this buggy player full of ads?

Quote:
MS Services for UNIX => gives me full UNIX System compatibilty, NFS..(MS gives this away just in case you didn't know..)
Yeah, Microsoft does so FOR FREE, so why the hell are you blaming Microsoft?


Most members of this forum crack high-class software, so they get in touch with it. They'll all have noticed, that that kind of software (and good software in general) is just available for Microsoft Windows OS. That's why nobody switched to Linucks and began to use crappy, buggy OpenSource-software (the only "advantage" of OpenSource-software is, it's "OpenSource" - so what?), which often is so limited, or is even completely unavailable for specific tasks.
I am NOT talking about those nasty One-Klick-Dummy-User-Software, but there is nothing like Photoshop (don't tell me about "gimp"), Scenarist, Cinema Craft Encoder, Audition, Acrobat, DVD Maestro, 3D Studio Max, etc.

There is no SINGLE reason to use Linux. It is not free: compare the prices!
SuSE Linux Professional: 90$
RedHat Enterprise Linux Workstation: 180$
These are just 2 examples of Linux-distributions which are more expensive than the Windows XP Operating System while offering much less features than the Microsoft product.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-23-2005, 02:44
ghalen
 
Posts: n/a
I must disagree, Linux is free, both as in free speech and free beer. It is the support and documentation you pay for when you buy RedHat and SuSE Linux. And i must say that Linux does support much more features than Microsoft Windows. Like since when did WindowsXP Pro get support for smp?

But thats just point of view. Nothing personally.

Cheers
ghalen
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:27
ntwizard
 
Posts: n/a
Big_or_what,

I agree with you. But I like to propose alternatives (the devil's advocate)..

Besides I really makes for good conversation.

I really don't use this method normally.

However, I wanted a alternative to use to run my system security and networking tools. I use these to secure and track or find hackers, ect. That way I am not vurnable myself before I even start the process.

One feature I really do like that you can remove un-necessary services and software and that's really my jest here.

Maybe this is beyond the scope of the forum, however I respect this forum and members and I wanted some input from programmers as well. I have proposed this idea on other forums and most of the members either don't understand or care..

But that not the case here..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2005, 00:44
ntwizard
 
Posts: n/a
I forgot to add that one could remove IE from xp SP1 and greater, to install IE so it will support MS Java VDM that M$ "fixed" after the court ruling..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-26-2005, 01:00
aldente aldente is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 266
Rept. Given: 27
Rept. Rcvd 7 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks Given: 36
Thanks Rcvd at 10 Times in 9 Posts
aldente Reputation: 7
But what is more important - a stable system, or the VM for one of the nastiest languages in the world?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:21.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )