![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank's JMI for unlighting me
Regards |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
We should thank Aaron for recognizing CrackZ's contributions to the Reversing craft by all this great contributions.
Regards,
__________________
JMI |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The OS is the biggest weakness aside from sloppy protection design.
Blah-blah-blah... I'm managing my small business in developing the protections for individual clients (not some widespread bullshit like armadillo or so) and I can assure you, OS doesn't really matter. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
well, we are interested in unpacking new thingz, (IF they are interesting)
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() My point is, you can write the most solid code, but it is the underlying design of the OS, Windows in particular, that would allow others to unravel the protection written to run on it. Until there is a fundamental change on the hardware level, (and not just an execution bit for example), M$ Windows apps will be more vunerable than apps written for a hardened OS or embedded system. Not a rant, no disrespect, just my 2-cents. -BG |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And that's also the reason why there are more virii, trojans and worms for Microsoft Windows. But every nasty bastard obviously thinks he'd have to blame Microsoft, and not all the dummy users, or the coders of such malware. If I'd code a trojan, it would just make sense to do so for a widely used operating system, and not for a system just a few thousand folks use. So it's definately NOT Microsoft's fault! Last edited by JMI; 02-05-2005 at 07:13. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DREAM++ decompiler: no more gotos | chants | General Discussion | 0 | 12-28-2017 14:57 |
| Request for a good protection scheme in Java | DaGoN | General Discussion | 7 | 02-20-2014 04:42 |
| Good Protection (Password Reminder) | anorganix | General Discussion | 6 | 11-22-2005 04:42 |