![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hiya,
The real clue here would be the value lc_checkout() actually returns, and also which version of the FLEXlm library the target uses. I've seen a few targets recently where HOSTID=ANY is expressly rejected by a local checkout filter, alternatively it could be the format of the fake license is incorrect, either way the return from lc_checkout() should give a starting point. Most of the targets using the Certicom routines still should call l_sg() the 2nd time, the seeds however won't be recovered. I'm sure you already knew this all anyway but if you've got something I can look at I'd be interested. Regards CrackZ. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help with a linux flexlm target | Sailor_EDA | General Discussion | 2 | 12-21-2007 20:22 |
| Flexlm 7.2 LIC file use on Flexlm 9.2 display error -73 ? | hanzi | General Discussion | 9 | 07-05-2006 18:51 |