Can Defox IV be unpacked?

[Leonid]

Originally Posted by goku

vh 2011 have method new unpack any version defox

Interesting. In 2009 VH state that it can unprotect defoxIII, but actually it wasn't true. Can you prove that VH2011 can unprotect defoxIV? Here in attachment there is small application protected with defoxIV. Can you unprotect it?

[uranus64]

As you may already known, Leonid is the author of DefoxIV.
And he is good friend with the Refox author. When Refox find application protected with defox ask you to "call" the author who is friend with Leonid.

"if this is your own application for which you are the lawful copyright holder, you can ask the author of ReFox for help to get the application fully decompiled"

[Leonid]

Originally Posted by narciszu

As you may already known, Leonid is the author of DefoxIV.

Yes, this is true.

Originally Posted by narciszu

And he is good friend with the Refox author.

No, this isn't true. I never met him and never mailed with him. Only once we participate in common discussion in the forum. Here is the link

hxxp://www.foxite.com/archives/defox-vs-refox-0000246133.htm

Originally Posted by narciszu

When Refox find application protected with defox ask you to "call" the author who is friend with Leonid.

Originally Posted by giv

What I find suspicious and I must honestly say that i suspect you of unfair competition with Mr. Jan Brebera, author of Refox , is that when you load a protected (Defox IV) software application in Refox it give us a message to get in touch with the author to tell us how to proceed.

Refox XII itself can show defox protected application file structure and unprotect two fxp files that are added by defox and present in all defox protected applications. Author states that he itself can unprotect also other files (all this is about DefoxIII, DefoxIV was released later), but I very doubt that this is true. In the thread from the link above I posted simple application protected with DefoxIII and asked to unprotect it. Nobody post the answer. I believe Refox author include this possibility in Refox XII in order to compromise its concurent Defox and so raise the sells of Refox XII. But I doubt he succeed. Really I don't see any reason to buy Refox XII (and even to use it).

Originally Posted by giv

Let's put your software to the trial.
As is apparent from your words to praise you can not decrypt with the VH2011.

I don't have VH2011, so I didn't try. And it is interesting for me to know whether it is true or not, so, I post here protected sample. If I will not get it unprotected I will consider that it isn't true.

Originally Posted by giv

So....something is rotten. It does not seem fair. I think somehow you two are trying to cheat making a cartel.

If you read all the thread in the link above, you'll check that I suggest not to use Refox XII for protection purposees because it is very weak. Doubt I'll do it if I were a member of cartel.

[uranus64]

@ Leonid
Probably you're right and you're not good friends with Jan Brebera. I've heard so. It means that I am wrong. My mistake. Anyway, your DeFox application is good one in my opinion.