Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-27-2011, 02:47
chessgod101's Avatar
chessgod101 chessgod101 is offline
Co-Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 539
Rept. Given: 2,242
Rept. Rcvd 704 Times in 224 Posts
Thanks Given: 754
Thanks Rcvd at 1,021 Times in 191 Posts
chessgod101 Reputation: 700-899 chessgod101 Reputation: 700-899 chessgod101 Reputation: 700-899 chessgod101 Reputation: 700-899 chessgod101 Reputation: 700-899 chessgod101 Reputation: 700-899 chessgod101 Reputation: 700-899
Your first statement is not exactly correct. For example, it is not possible to patch a rar archive to accept a faux serial. I have also seen programs the the author encrypted specific features of a program which could only be decrypted with a valid serial. To solve these problems, brute force is the only viable option. Depending on the length of the serial/password, it could take centuries to brute force a valid value. Hypothetically, once you get a valid serial(be it brute forced of leaked), you could nop the decryption routine and patch the correctly decrypted code into the program.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-27-2011, 02:56
FrankyFive
 
Posts: n/a
Sure. I've forgotten to say that my statement isn't referred to cases that requires a key to decrypt something (this last problem, imho, isn't a reversing problem but is a cryptography problem because we have a piece of code encrypted without a routine that decrypt that piece of code)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 02:19.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )