|
|
|
|
#1
12-21-2012, 00:49
|
||||
|
||||
|
yep,
I tried it on a complex target and found it very promising. It still suffer being in a pre alpha stage, and still lacks of several useful things (es better interface more towards Olly stile, better coloring of ASM and so on). Looks really as a promising substitute for Olly x64. If you want it can also be converted in an opensourced project so as to be able to add more complex interfaces, but it's your decision of course.
__________________
Ŝħůb-Ňìĝùŕřaŧħ ₪) There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't http://www.accessroot.com 
|
|
#2
12-26-2012, 05:13
|
|||
|
|||
|
@ Cyberbob
Yes,really BugDBG is still lacking the nice and handy interface of ollydbg and all current x64 debuggers lack that nice interface except IDA But always OllyDbg stay the best for debugging. So,We will wait for a nicer interface in BugDBG 
|
|
#3
12-26-2012, 06:36
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ mm10121991
well, you can't make everyone happy I personally like it and don't need interface with dozen of toolbars, status bar and dozen of different dialogue's instead I prefer command line.
|
| The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to cyberbob For This Useful Post: | ||
chessgod101 (12-26-2012) | ||
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
