new KeyGenMe

chessgod101 · #1 09-10-2013, 18:44

giv, the problem is that the string is being encoded as unicode. In order to get the correct hash, you need to encode the string using ASCIIEncoding instead of UnicodeEncoding.
When the string is encoded as unicode, these are the bytes that get hashed:

Code:

67 00 69 00 76 00

When you hash it as an ASCII string, these bytes get hashed and yield the correct result:

Code:

67 69 76

giv · #2 10-13-2013, 22:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by chessgod101

giv, the problem is that the string is being encoded as unicode. In order to get the correct hash, you need to encode the string using ASCIIEncoding instead of UnicodeEncoding.
When the string is encoded as unicode, these are the bytes that get hashed:

Code:

67 00 69 00 76 00

When you hash it as an ASCII string, these bytes get hashed and yield the correct result:

Code:

67 69 76

I do as you point at but the result is the same.
Maybe L.C. is right.
I must change XP

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Ripping from v0!d keygenme 1	Zeocrack	Source Code	4	10-10-2022 04:15
Keygenme (Easy?)	dila	Source Code	8	07-25-2015 20:43

The Following 2 Users Gave Reputation+1 to chessgod101 For This Useful Post:
LordCoder (09-10-2013)