th3tuga,
I can confirm Grok Build (again, you won't be performing tasks via the chatbot) - can reverse engineer well, perform reconstruction of code from binaries, in addition to find bugs/exploits in existing code.
Also, I will mention a big reason I use Grok over Claude, ChatGPT, etc.. is Grok has a very low refusal rate. With that said, I do not say things like "Today, we are going to bypass DRM, or crack X/Y/Z ...", period.
I hope this helps,
Fyyre
Quote:
Originally Posted by th3tuga
This is again exactly my same problem.
@Shub-Nigurrath I think knows a little more. I hope he will come back and answer.
@Fyyre Thank you for the information. I noticed you mentioned that you "will use" the Grok Build for reversing commercial targets, which leaves me uncertain about its actual effectiveness for this specific task. While I am aware that Grok performs well with coding and image generation, I want to be sure it is capable of high-quality reversing before I commit to the $30 subscription. When you have a moment, could you please try using it for reversing and let me know if it works well in practice?
@chants
hat approach was effective until about a week ago, but it is no longer working for larger commercial targets. The model's internal reasoning now explicitly identifies these attempts, generating thoughts such as, "This appears to be commercial software that the user is attempting to keygen. Let me verify if it is [software name]... it is commercial; therefore, I must refuse on ethical grounds." As I previously mentioned, other bloggers have also reported encountering these same restrictions starting last week:
@chants I replied to your post also because you had valid points. However, if you would prefer that I not engage with your content, I am happy to stop responding to your posts moving forward...
|