![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I am not anyone who you think me to be... ![]() I have again checked my posts. I've hardly even interacted with any of your posts... ![]() Quote:
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
"would have been banned long ago on any other forum" the same exact thing all the banned accounts would always say. That looks copy and pasted even. Dude the gig is up, if you cant let bygones be bygones, then scram. 8+ years of this childish nonsense and making yourself the most despised person in all of reversing and yet still you persist. You should be grateful to even have an account here given the disgustingly hostile acts impersonating and harassing members here should amount to a life sentence.
It would be nice to return to discussing MCP. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I made that statement because calling someone as "mentally handicapped" does get you banned on any online forum these days... There is a way to disagree without referring to them as "mentally handicapped". It appears to me that you attack any non-VIP user who remotely interacts in any thread that you've replied. Of course, you can't attack other VIP users since that would get you immediately banned. So you're attacking accounts like mine who have never even interacted with you? |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
You revealed yourself in the LLM watermarking thread bringing up all these forum hostility tactics and diverting the topic. We knew about some Oct/Nov 2023 accounts had still persisted. And the dramatic responses are identical to in previous years. Same old accusations, denials demands, topic diversion etc. Ive very little problem with members regardless of status but nice way to make yet another accusation further exposing your agenda. Besides already banned accounts I have a shortlist of troublemakers, disrupters and clearly disgruntled former members. There isn't a single honest person here who cant precisely identify you by now. The pattern is simply too obvious. Just go away dude and stop being vindictive.
Anyway let's return to MCP discussion. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Every post of mine was about the MCP here until you started to attack me out of thin air calling me "mentally handicapped". |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyway returning to the mcp discussion...
The refusals from Claude have become very bad recently. See this: Quote:
It used to be fairly easy to jailbreak, but that’s no longer really the case. It might still work in some situations, depending on the specific case, but it isn’t dependable or reproducible. Because of that, using local models is the better option. Many of the newer local models released recently have improved a lot and are now very capable. |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is my personal setup at the moment. I certainly do not claim it to be better or worse than another solution.
I use Grok Build, with Grok as the backend .. which is connected to the "Super Grok" account which I pay for monthly. One advantage to this is it's quota is tied into the weekly overall Grok token quota (regardless whether one uses the chatbot, image/video generation, grok build, etc..). Using Grok Build is cheaper token wise than simply talking to the chatbot. If I want Grok to assist with reversing, I'm going to start grok build in a directory where I've placed tools (radare2, Ghidra headless, etc..) for it, along with the target. I clearly explain the objective as well.
__________________
Pax in vultu, bellum in corde. -- https://github.com/Fyyre |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ive had great success with these tools the first is for a semantic graph and interface for asking questions or renaming functions and variables and such with LLMs:
https://github.com/symgraph/GhidrAssist https://github.com/symgraph/GhidrAssistMCP I noticed the author fully support Binary Ninja and IDA Pro as well: https://github.com/symgraph/BinAssist https://github.com/symgraph/BinAssistMCP https://github.com/symgraph/IDAssist https://github.com/symgraph/IDAssistMCP Im not sure why ive had little trouble reversing, though i was fixing bugs in binaries so maybe that is considered an okay use case. Ive no idea what sets off the flags on the big providers and I would imagine each provider is different. I have had it refuse in cases that were low levrl programming with huge output files likely as it somehow mistook it for distillation. |
![]() |
|
|