![]() |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes , ok , xprotector is unstable because it is a very new product.
And this (i think) because it includes some very new characteristics such as the Ring0 binding , that is an "unknown word" for some other protection tools. Take a look at the whitepaper...it is a very professional project. Ok , every good project needs time...beta-testing , feedbacks and i believe that everyone (interested in protection technology) must help good programmers.(this is my personal think) I am using also , asprotect , armadillo and ok these versions are very very very stable. They have 99% compatibility. But these protection tools are available since the last 3-4 years. And as we can say , the "beta-testing" is already completed. XProtector as i can remember is only available in the last 1 + year. But let's see the guys from xprotector team what they will make in the next 1 - 2 years. After that period , we can again give our positive or negative vote ![]() But again , i don't have seen an unpacked or cracked version and i don't believe that the biggest's minds arround the globe don't have tried to crack it. Am i right ? Regards, VD |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best Protection: ASProtect 2 or Armadillo 4? | smartins | General Discussion | 22 | 01-24-2005 04:27 |
| ASProtect 1.23 RC4 - 1.3.08.24 | LaBBa | General Discussion | 1 | 05-13-2004 23:54 |