![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
damn people inventing things before i do! lol
of course more interproc comunication would be done... maybe even decryption of code while running. (both ways child<>parent). Dynamicly loading the api calls and then checking there address's for breakpoints before calling them would make it a tiny bit harder. some extra anti debug things could be added too. Anyone have more ideas? (just for the record this is not going to be used in any protection i am making.. well maybe a crackme in the future... i am just interested in protection and not trooling for ideas... i wouldnt give away my secrets if i were :P) |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Debug Me 0.1 (Another debugging protection) | Teerayoot | General Discussion | 25 | 01-15-2005 04:43 |
| Any idea? | annibal | General Discussion | 2 | 09-01-2003 03:09 |