Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old 08-17-2003, 17:07
Rhodium
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Squidge
What would be the point of this? Considering the fact that most buffer exploits are doing over the intenet, where you don't have access to the machine to change any of the assembler - you only have the interface of the program that is running.

Secondly, once the program has compiled, trying to change a static buffer size to less than it was orignally set to would be very difficult, as if it was a global variable, it would most likely be a space in the exe, and local variables would simply be space on the stack.
Edit: I mean for patching an RSA key or stuff like that.

Last edited by Rhodium; 08-17-2003 at 17:11.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OllyDBG v1.10 and ImpREC v1.7f export name buffer overflow vulnerability bukkake General Discussion 0 07-28-2008 03:40
Buffer Overflow in SentinelLM Service prt General Discussion 0 03-19-2005 05:20
DataRescue Interactive Disassembler Pro Buffer Overflow Vulnerability bukkake General Discussion 0 01-25-2005 11:23


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 15:13.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )